1
00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:02,659
well it's a pleasure to be here I must

2
00:00:07,730 --> 00:00:05,490
confess that after hearing the morning

3
00:00:11,150 --> 00:00:07,740
and afternoon about various

4
00:00:13,430 --> 00:00:11,160
conversations related to UFOs and such

5
00:00:15,470 --> 00:00:13,440
controversial work what I'm about to

6
00:00:22,700 --> 00:00:15,480
share with you may sound mundane in

7
00:00:24,380 --> 00:00:22,710
comparison which is unusual for me the

8
00:00:26,810 --> 00:00:24,390
title of this research is the effects of

9
00:00:31,669 --> 00:00:26,820
distant group intention on the growth of

10
00:00:33,950 --> 00:00:31,679
seedlings and it involves myself and

11
00:00:37,160 --> 00:00:33,960
mark Baku's II and limbic Taggart and

12
00:00:41,049 --> 00:00:37,170
Melinda Conner in this particular

13
00:00:43,610 --> 00:00:41,059
research was actually funded by a

14
00:00:47,270 --> 00:00:43,620
foundation associated with Canyon Ranch

15
00:00:51,049 --> 00:00:47,280
and if it wasn't for their openness this

16
00:00:53,979 --> 00:00:51,059
kind of work could never take place the

17
00:00:56,090 --> 00:00:53,989
work is uh there's been many studies of

18
00:00:57,889 --> 00:00:56,100
distant about local and distant

19
00:01:00,979 --> 00:00:57,899
intentionality related to living systems

20
00:01:04,179 --> 00:01:00,989
and they're reviewed in two recent books

21
00:01:06,740 --> 00:01:04,189
as well as books by Dean Radin and

22
00:01:08,230 --> 00:01:06,750
clothes Swanson and so on one is called

23
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:08,240
the energy healing experiments which I

24
00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:11,010
wrote to summarized our research over

25
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:13,530
the past ten years and the second is the

26
00:01:18,109 --> 00:01:15,090
intention experiment by Lynne McTaggart

27
00:01:19,609 --> 00:01:18,119
which I suspect many of you have heard

28
00:01:20,929 --> 00:01:19,619
of what's interesting by the way is that

29
00:01:25,700 --> 00:01:20,939
neither of these books use the word

30
00:01:28,730 --> 00:01:25,710
parapsychology because we do see this as

31
00:01:32,450 --> 00:01:28,740
as a although some of the phenomena may

32
00:01:34,730 --> 00:01:32,460
seem strange or anomalistic this is

33
00:01:38,899 --> 00:01:34,740
something that apparently applies to all

34
00:01:40,850 --> 00:01:38,909
of us now I will not be talking today

35
00:01:43,420 --> 00:01:40,860
about research that we've done both with

36
00:01:46,730 --> 00:01:43,430
local and distant intentionality on

37
00:01:51,170 --> 00:01:46,740
biophoton emission in plants using a

38
00:01:54,319 --> 00:01:51,180
super cooled ccd camera system the cool

39
00:01:57,380 --> 00:01:54,329
to minus 100 degrees centigrade although

40
00:01:59,510 --> 00:01:57,390
this work is really phenomenal it would

41
00:02:01,280 --> 00:01:59,520
take a whole presentation and what I

42
00:02:04,249 --> 00:02:01,290
instead want to talk to you about is an

43
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:04,259
application of distant intentionality to

44
00:02:08,690 --> 00:02:07,530
the growth of of barley seeds and part

45
00:02:11,059 --> 00:02:08,700
of the reason for selecting this

46
00:02:12,070 --> 00:02:11,069
preparation is because it's research

47
00:02:14,530 --> 00:02:12,080
that

48
00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:14,540
can be done by virtually anyone

49
00:02:19,090 --> 00:02:16,970
including high school students and it

50
00:02:21,850 --> 00:02:19,100
has obvious direct potential

51
00:02:23,370 --> 00:02:21,860
applications to the vitality of our

52
00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:23,380
planet

53
00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:25,970
whereas biophoton omission is a bit of

54
00:02:31,180 --> 00:02:30,050
esoteric for for non-scientists so the

55
00:02:33,250 --> 00:02:31,190
purpose with the German where the

56
00:02:35,530 --> 00:02:33,260
distant group intention could affect the

57
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:35,540
growth of barley seeds under blinded

58
00:02:39,070 --> 00:02:37,010
experimental conditions that was the

59
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:39,080
first purpose second was determining

60
00:02:43,330 --> 00:02:40,730
whether there might be a called spread

61
00:02:44,470 --> 00:02:43,340
of affect within a given experiment on

62
00:02:46,900 --> 00:02:44,480
the growth of barley seeds and the

63
00:02:49,210 --> 00:02:46,910
reason is because the seeds were closed

64
00:02:51,340 --> 00:02:49,220
fairly placed fairly close together as

65
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:51,350
you will see and the question is how

66
00:02:55,870 --> 00:02:53,690
specific with the intention bead to the

67
00:02:57,520 --> 00:02:55,880
seeds that were targeted and the third

68
00:02:59,620 --> 00:02:57,530
is to explore where the groups trained

69
00:03:01,330 --> 00:02:59,630
in focused attention and healing would

70
00:03:06,700 --> 00:03:01,340
have a greater and/or more selective

71
00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:06,710
effect on the growth of barley seeds now

72
00:03:13,630 --> 00:03:11,210
each experiment had 120 seeds in a

73
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:13,640
blinded distant group intention session

74
00:03:17,770 --> 00:03:15,290
by the way that was also something that

75
00:03:20,260 --> 00:03:17,780
was you could get many more subjects for

76
00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:20,270
experiment if you worked with seeds than

77
00:03:23,949 --> 00:03:22,130
where he worked for example leaves or or

78
00:03:26,620 --> 00:03:23,959
vegetables that took up a large space in

79
00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:26,630
the camera and then we had 120 seeds in

80
00:03:31,900 --> 00:03:28,250
a matched control which was a non

81
00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:31,910
intention session for each session the

82
00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:34,730
distant group intention and control the

83
00:03:40,300 --> 00:03:37,610
seeds were divided into a four sets and

84
00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:40,310
of 30 seeds per group which was simply

85
00:03:45,190 --> 00:03:43,250
labeled a B C and D and then one of the

86
00:03:48,460 --> 00:03:45,200
four sets was randomly selected as the

87
00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:48,470
intention targeted seed and of 30 seeds

88
00:03:52,540 --> 00:03:50,090
the other three sets became the non

89
00:03:54,699 --> 00:03:52,550
targeted controls for an end of 90 seeds

90
00:03:57,790 --> 00:03:54,709
and the match control session used the

91
00:04:02,380 --> 00:03:57,800
same targeted and non targeted control

92
00:04:04,330 --> 00:04:02,390
sets now the the experimental part is as

93
00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:04,340
follows this is basically a picture of

94
00:04:07,449 --> 00:04:06,050
the laboratory where the room where the

95
00:04:10,060 --> 00:04:07,459
research was run and you could see the

96
00:04:11,850 --> 00:04:10,070
pots and the computer and so on what

97
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:11,860
would happen is that we would select

98
00:04:17,110 --> 00:04:14,690
research assistant would select 120

99
00:04:20,020 --> 00:04:17,120
seats place them in four trays a b c and

100
00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:20,030
d and he would gently move them so they

101
00:04:24,159 --> 00:04:21,250
were more or less in alignment

102
00:04:25,270 --> 00:04:24,169
photographs would then be taken of a b c

103
00:04:28,510 --> 00:04:25,280
and d

104
00:04:31,450 --> 00:04:28,520
and then those four photographs would be

105
00:04:33,129 --> 00:04:31,460
emailed to Lynne McTaggart who happened

106
00:04:36,159 --> 00:04:33,139
to be at a meeting somewhere in the

107
00:04:39,070 --> 00:04:36,169
world where they would the audience

108
00:04:41,800 --> 00:04:39,080
member would select randomly a B C or D

109
00:04:43,870 --> 00:04:41,810
and then one of these sets of images

110
00:04:46,180 --> 00:04:43,880
would therefore go up on the screen and

111
00:04:48,730 --> 00:04:46,190
that would be the seeds for which the

112
00:04:51,790 --> 00:04:48,740
intention to grow would be sent for 10

113
00:04:54,310 --> 00:04:51,800
to 15 minutes after after that intention

114
00:04:56,530 --> 00:04:54,320
was completed the the research assistant

115
00:04:58,900 --> 00:04:56,540
was blind to which of the four sets had

116
00:05:00,670 --> 00:04:58,910
been selected he would then put a fixed

117
00:05:03,310 --> 00:05:00,680
amount of water in each of the seeds and

118
00:05:05,050 --> 00:05:03,320
then the the they would sit for 24 hours

119
00:05:07,990 --> 00:05:05,060
and soak the seeds would then be washed

120
00:05:10,930 --> 00:05:08,000
then they would be planted at a fixed

121
00:05:12,550 --> 00:05:10,940
amount of soil with nutrients and then a

122
00:05:14,830 --> 00:05:12,560
fixed amount of water would be placed on

123
00:05:16,990 --> 00:05:14,840
top all of that would then be encased in

124
00:05:19,090 --> 00:05:17,000
a in a plastic bags that the seeds grew

125
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:19,100
in the dark for five days with no

126
00:05:24,610 --> 00:05:22,130
additional water administered and so

127
00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:24,620
there the four pops are and then at the

128
00:05:29,590 --> 00:05:27,770
end of the four days the seeds would be

129
00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:29,600
open five days you could see now that

130
00:05:33,130 --> 00:05:31,250
they're growing that they have grown and

131
00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:33,140
then each of them would be pulled out

132
00:05:37,900 --> 00:05:35,570
and and measured in terms of millimeters

133
00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:37,910
and that would be recorded and then it

134
00:05:42,190 --> 00:05:39,770
would be put into a spreadsheets and an

135
00:05:43,840 --> 00:05:42,200
ultimately statistical analysis analyzed

136
00:05:45,670 --> 00:05:43,850
of course it was after this whole

137
00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:45,680
process was done that the code would

138
00:05:50,350 --> 00:05:47,690
then be broken we would then be informed

139
00:05:52,990 --> 00:05:50,360
which a B of C D was the targeted versus

140
00:05:54,340 --> 00:05:53,000
non targeted conditions through a total

141
00:05:56,770 --> 00:05:54,350
of six experiments these were

142
00:05:58,930 --> 00:05:56,780
opportunistic meaning we didn't have

143
00:06:00,520 --> 00:05:58,940
control we didn't we didn't select the

144
00:06:03,250 --> 00:06:00,530
subjects we didn't select the timing

145
00:06:05,500 --> 00:06:03,260
they just took advantage of when Lin was

146
00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:05,510
doing one of these workshops and there

147
00:06:10,390 --> 00:06:07,370
was one in Sydney Australia with a group

148
00:06:12,820 --> 00:06:10,400
size of about six hundred and you could

149
00:06:14,830 --> 00:06:12,830
see that that audience picked target a

150
00:06:16,570 --> 00:06:14,840
there was an online study that was

151
00:06:18,070 --> 00:06:16,580
conducted by a London then there was one

152
00:06:20,980 --> 00:06:18,080
in Rhinebeck New York one in Palm

153
00:06:22,870 --> 00:06:20,990
Springs actually the Austin Texas one

154
00:06:24,700 --> 00:06:22,880
was actually the sixth experiment but I

155
00:06:26,710 --> 00:06:24,710
listed it in order here as the fifth

156
00:06:29,260 --> 00:06:26,720
only because I wanted that especially

157
00:06:31,029 --> 00:06:29,270
especially note that the Hilton Head

158
00:06:34,029 --> 00:06:31,039
experiment of which there were five

159
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:34,039
hundred subjects was actually a group of

160
00:06:37,410 --> 00:06:35,210
which was convenient

161
00:06:39,450 --> 00:06:37,420
it was a Healing Touch international

162
00:06:41,130 --> 00:06:39,460
meeting of Healing Touch practitioners

163
00:06:44,310 --> 00:06:41,140
so this was a group that we happen to

164
00:06:47,460 --> 00:06:44,320
have who were practiced in the art of

165
00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:47,470
focusing intention and and healing and

166
00:06:51,810 --> 00:06:49,930
for the six experiments the total number

167
00:06:53,970 --> 00:06:51,820
of scenes or subjects was fourteen

168
00:06:55,830 --> 00:06:53,980
hundred and forty subjects which is very

169
00:06:59,490 --> 00:06:55,840
large for the kind of research that we

170
00:07:02,520 --> 00:06:59,500
typically do this is a summary of the

171
00:07:05,130 --> 00:07:02,530
data and what this curve shows is on the

172
00:07:08,370 --> 00:07:05,140
Left where it says intention days those

173
00:07:11,820 --> 00:07:08,380
contain the the targeted seeds which is

174
00:07:14,460 --> 00:07:11,830
which is the blue square and the non

175
00:07:17,010 --> 00:07:14,470
targeted control seeds which was the

176
00:07:20,670 --> 00:07:17,020
guess you'd say that's red and you can

177
00:07:23,610 --> 00:07:20,680
see that there is a it's much higher in

178
00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:23,620
the for the intended seed than the

179
00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:26,650
controls then for the non intention day

180
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:29,530
which was a day which was not blinded

181
00:07:33,780 --> 00:07:32,050
but was also five days of growing of the

182
00:07:36,420 --> 00:07:33,790
seeds but where there was no intention

183
00:07:40,310 --> 00:07:36,430
going into the lab you could see that in

184
00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:40,320
both in both cases it was lower and

185
00:07:45,990 --> 00:07:43,650
significantly so in terms of analyses

186
00:07:47,340 --> 00:07:46,000
several dopers were conducted on the

187
00:07:49,020 --> 00:07:47,350
group intention and non intention

188
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:49,030
controlled days for the intention day

189
00:07:53,430 --> 00:07:51,130
only which was the blinded condition the

190
00:07:56,700 --> 00:07:53,440
main effect for target was significantly

191
00:07:59,040 --> 00:07:56,710
less 0.07 for the non intention day only

192
00:08:00,960 --> 00:07:59,050
the main effects for target was non

193
00:08:03,180 --> 00:08:00,970
significant in other words there was no

194
00:08:05,160 --> 00:08:03,190
difference in the in the in the

195
00:08:07,020 --> 00:08:05,170
attention versus target versus non

196
00:08:10,380 --> 00:08:07,030
targeted when there was no intention

197
00:08:12,660 --> 00:08:10,390
given at all now the main effect for

198
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:12,670
intention day attention day versus the

199
00:08:18,420 --> 00:08:15,130
non attention day was highly significant

200
00:08:20,820 --> 00:08:18,430
that's the two points on the on the Left

201
00:08:22,710 --> 00:08:20,830
versus the two points on the right and

202
00:08:24,210 --> 00:08:22,720
separate numbers were conducted

203
00:08:26,610 --> 00:08:24,220
separately for the target seed and the

204
00:08:28,770 --> 00:08:26,620
non targeted seeds and you can see that

205
00:08:31,860 --> 00:08:28,780
both of those effects were highly

206
00:08:33,990 --> 00:08:31,870
statistically significant so it looked

207
00:08:36,330 --> 00:08:34,000
like the possibility that there might be

208
00:08:38,250 --> 00:08:36,340
a spread of effect that was occurring

209
00:08:40,380 --> 00:08:38,260
with a targeted even the non targeted

210
00:08:41,730 --> 00:08:40,390
seeds were being accentuated but of

211
00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:41,740
course you have to remember that part of

212
00:08:46,140 --> 00:08:44,050
the study was not blind so there are

213
00:08:47,780 --> 00:08:46,150
alternative interpretations that that

214
00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:47,790
are open to the data

215
00:08:52,370 --> 00:08:49,290
now I said that there were one

216
00:08:54,950 --> 00:08:52,380
particular group which was the Healing

217
00:08:57,410 --> 00:08:54,960
Touch international group and I looked

218
00:09:00,230 --> 00:08:57,420
at them separately what's interesting

219
00:09:03,020 --> 00:09:00,240
about this group by itself is that first

220
00:09:05,330 --> 00:09:03,030
of all it showed the largest specificity

221
00:09:06,890 --> 00:09:05,340
effect that is the target seeds compared

222
00:09:09,260 --> 00:09:06,900
to the non targeted seeds in the

223
00:09:12,050 --> 00:09:09,270
intention date and interestingly they

224
00:09:14,450 --> 00:09:12,060
showed no essentially non intention day

225
00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:14,460
effect comparison to the non intention

226
00:09:19,550 --> 00:09:16,890
day suggesting that they were showing

227
00:09:21,620 --> 00:09:19,560
greater specificity and therefore less

228
00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:21,630
spread of effect which would be

229
00:09:29,180 --> 00:09:25,970
consistent with the intention hypothesis

230
00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:29,190
now to examine whether the a versus IDI

231
00:09:32,090 --> 00:09:30,930
targets were possibly different because

232
00:09:34,700 --> 00:09:32,100
obviously it was not a completely

233
00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:34,710
randomized order with an end of six and

234
00:09:37,940 --> 00:09:36,210
other was performed on just the

235
00:09:40,070 --> 00:09:37,950
intention sessions which were blinded

236
00:09:42,110 --> 00:09:40,080
comparing the four experiments with the

237
00:09:44,930 --> 00:09:42,120
eight targets versus the two experiments

238
00:09:46,460 --> 00:09:44,940
with the CD targets the main effect

239
00:09:48,050 --> 00:09:46,470
photographers hasn't on the target again

240
00:09:50,150 --> 00:09:48,060
was significant which was not surprising

241
00:09:52,300 --> 00:09:50,160
however there was no interaction with

242
00:09:54,980 --> 00:09:52,310
the target placement a versus CD

243
00:10:00,290 --> 00:09:54,990
indicating that position did not seem to

244
00:10:02,870 --> 00:10:00,300
be a factor in explaining the results so

245
00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:02,880
conclusions over the six experiments

246
00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:05,370
distant group intention in a blinded

247
00:10:09,230 --> 00:10:07,530
experimental design was associated with

248
00:10:12,010 --> 00:10:09,240
increased growth but barley seeds in

249
00:10:14,150 --> 00:10:12,020
targeted return on targeted seeds

250
00:10:15,650 --> 00:10:14,160
secondly this effect could not be

251
00:10:17,620 --> 00:10:15,660
explained in terms of random selection

252
00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:17,630
of the targeted seeds over the

253
00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:22,170
experiments third over the six

254
00:10:25,910 --> 00:10:24,210
experiments distant group intention was

255
00:10:27,680 --> 00:10:25,920
associated with overall increase poly

256
00:10:30,500 --> 00:10:27,690
growth in targeted non targeted scenes

257
00:10:32,690 --> 00:10:30,510
compared with matched non intention

258
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:32,700
control sessions just in general those

259
00:10:37,670 --> 00:10:35,130
seats grew more now because this

260
00:10:39,460 --> 00:10:37,680
comparison was not blinded a possible

261
00:10:42,620 --> 00:10:39,470
experiment effect cannot be ruled out

262
00:10:46,130 --> 00:10:42,630
however a quote anomaly or unexpected

263
00:10:47,870 --> 00:10:46,140
effect in the data emerged which had to

264
00:10:49,910 --> 00:10:47,880
do with a last experiment which was the

265
00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:49,920
Austin experiment it turned out and that

266
00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:51,890
was the only experiment with a non

267
00:11:00,140 --> 00:10:56,010
intended day seeds overall were higher

268
00:11:01,129 --> 00:11:00,150
than the targeted seeds and non targeted

269
00:11:03,619 --> 00:11:01,139
seeds

270
00:11:05,269 --> 00:11:03,629
the intention day and it turned out that

271
00:11:07,460 --> 00:11:05,279
it was during that period of time that

272
00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:07,470
we were breaking the laboratory down in

273
00:11:12,169 --> 00:11:10,410
the last couple of days for construction

274
00:11:14,239 --> 00:11:12,179
to take place which meant there was

275
00:11:18,919 --> 00:11:14,249
other energy in the room

276
00:11:20,809 --> 00:11:18,929
sound and and so on and and that's the

277
00:11:23,470 --> 00:11:20,819
one case where there was a reversal to

278
00:11:25,340 --> 00:11:23,480
what the with the other groups showed

279
00:11:27,079 --> 00:11:25,350
suggesting that even if there was an

280
00:11:29,539 --> 00:11:27,089
experiment effect it could be also be

281
00:11:32,150 --> 00:11:29,549
affected by other environmental factors

282
00:11:34,549 --> 00:11:32,160
and we'll see by the way in coming in

283
00:11:37,179 --> 00:11:34,559
tomorrow when Joey Jones presents the

284
00:11:39,679 --> 00:11:37,189
the environment of the laboratory

285
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:39,689
energetically can have effect on living

286
00:11:45,049 --> 00:11:43,410
systems now the large magnitude targeted

287
00:11:46,849 --> 00:11:45,059
effect in The Healing Touch practitioner

288
00:11:48,379 --> 00:11:46,859
experiment couples of the absence of a

289
00:11:50,449 --> 00:11:48,389
spread of affect and tension effect

290
00:11:54,499 --> 00:11:50,459
further suggests the importance of

291
00:11:56,179 --> 00:11:54,509
distant group intention one of the

292
00:11:57,559 --> 00:11:56,189
things that's that's very interesting

293
00:11:59,989 --> 00:11:57,569
about distant group intention is

294
00:12:01,849 --> 00:11:59,999
implicitly it's it's talking about some

295
00:12:02,979 --> 00:12:01,859
of the implications that Claud Swanson

296
00:12:05,509 --> 00:12:02,989
talked about with regard to

297
00:12:07,970 --> 00:12:05,519
synchronization and because when you

298
00:12:09,799 --> 00:12:07,980
have multiple individuals simultaneously

299
00:12:12,439 --> 00:12:09,809
putting their intention on a given

300
00:12:14,479 --> 00:12:12,449
object one could speculate that the

301
00:12:16,189 --> 00:12:14,489
group would have greater effects through

302
00:12:20,539 --> 00:12:16,199
some sort of a coherence or synchronized

303
00:12:22,699 --> 00:12:20,549
action conclusions obviously the quote

304
00:12:26,059 --> 00:12:22,709
opportunistic aspect of these six

305
00:12:29,509 --> 00:12:26,069
experiments is not ideal on the other

306
00:12:31,850 --> 00:12:29,519
hand they point out that these effects

307
00:12:35,900 --> 00:12:31,860
may apply in the real world at least the

308
00:12:38,299 --> 00:12:35,910
real world of conferences secondly

309
00:12:40,789 --> 00:12:38,309
adding a second blinded experimenter

310
00:12:43,189 --> 00:12:40,799
would make it possible to run blinded

311
00:12:45,019 --> 00:12:43,199
control sessions as well in other words

312
00:12:48,049 --> 00:12:45,029
if we if we do this kind of work in the

313
00:12:50,059 --> 00:12:48,059
future we and we have two experimenters

314
00:12:52,069 --> 00:12:50,069
and they don't know on a given weekend

315
00:12:53,929 --> 00:12:52,079
what whether it's a it's going to be an

316
00:12:56,119 --> 00:12:53,939
attention experiment or not then we can

317
00:12:58,039 --> 00:12:56,129
address the the spread of effect effect

318
00:13:00,229 --> 00:12:58,049
now a lot of questions to address

319
00:13:02,090 --> 00:13:00,239
including distance number of intenders

320
00:13:05,090 --> 00:13:02,100
in a group the type of groups such as

321
00:13:06,769 --> 00:13:05,100
healers and so on running skeptic groups

322
00:13:10,069 --> 00:13:06,779
which I really want to try someday and

323
00:13:11,539 --> 00:13:10,079
controls and finally I just like to

324
00:13:13,479 --> 00:13:11,549
share that we we've become very

325
00:13:14,670 --> 00:13:13,489
interested in the nature of water itself

326
00:13:16,079 --> 00:13:14,680
and

327
00:13:17,850 --> 00:13:16,089
you know there are theremin studies in

328
00:13:20,460 --> 00:13:17,860
fact Glenn's gonna be talking shortly

329
00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:20,470
about about intentionality in water and

330
00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:22,810
the question arises what happens if

331
00:13:26,730 --> 00:13:24,850
intention instead of being sent to the

332
00:13:28,460 --> 00:13:26,740
seeds is going to be sent to water

333
00:13:31,290 --> 00:13:28,470
that's going to nourish the seeds and

334
00:13:33,900 --> 00:13:31,300
then that water is then given to the

335
00:13:35,460 --> 00:13:33,910
seeds and of course the seeds have not

336
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:35,470
been selected until after the water has

337
00:13:39,960 --> 00:13:37,810
been energized so there isn't a compound

338
00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:39,970
there can we find that at least some of

339
00:13:45,449 --> 00:13:42,250
this effect is actually affecting the

340
00:13:47,550 --> 00:13:45,459
structure or the energy of that which

341
00:13:50,820 --> 00:13:47,560
makes up all living systems which is a

342
00:13:51,990 --> 00:13:50,830
which is water itself I must confess by

343
00:13:54,290 --> 00:13:52,000
the way that when I started these

344
00:13:56,579 --> 00:13:54,300
experiments well despite having

345
00:13:58,740 --> 00:13:56,589
published a book summarizing a lot of

346
00:14:00,600 --> 00:13:58,750
research with local or you know fairly

347
00:14:05,730 --> 00:14:00,610
local you know within feet in

348
00:14:10,050 --> 00:14:05,740
intentionality I was very surprised by

349
00:14:13,079 --> 00:14:10,060
the potential robustness of a potential

350
00:14:14,190 --> 00:14:13,089
distance and tension effects on on

351
00:14:24,390 --> 00:14:14,200
living systems

352
00:14:38,950 --> 00:14:24,400
thank you we have questions you're the

353
00:14:43,220 --> 00:14:41,690
the effect would be between the local

354
00:14:47,510 --> 00:14:43,230
and a non-local as mayor is it really

355
00:14:49,100 --> 00:14:47,520
better when you're closed well looking

356
00:14:51,590 --> 00:14:49,110
at these data remember there was only

357
00:14:53,420 --> 00:14:51,600
six experiments and we looked at the

358
00:14:55,220 --> 00:14:53,430
distance effect and we also potential

359
00:14:58,130 --> 00:14:55,230
distance effect we also looked at the

360
00:15:02,030 --> 00:14:58,140
potential you know end of the group 100

361
00:15:03,890 --> 00:15:02,040
versus 500 of 617 tenders and there were

362
00:15:05,780 --> 00:15:03,900
certainly no statistical differences and

363
00:15:06,950 --> 00:15:05,790
no significant correlations but again

364
00:15:10,430 --> 00:15:06,960
you're only dealing with an end of six

365
00:15:15,310 --> 00:15:10,440
so I really can't speak to that as far

366
00:15:22,610 --> 00:15:19,430
are we measuring growth or how fast

367
00:15:25,850 --> 00:15:22,620
they're growing the this engineers thing

368
00:15:27,410 --> 00:15:25,860
comes to mind is you know there's lots

369
00:15:31,250 --> 00:15:27,420
of people in this world who need more

370
00:15:34,100 --> 00:15:31,260
food and is this an is is this a way to

371
00:15:37,700 --> 00:15:34,110
get a higher yield of barley I think

372
00:15:41,060 --> 00:15:37,710
that would be the pragmatic future work

373
00:15:45,340 --> 00:15:41,070
but it either address whether it's just

374
00:15:49,940 --> 00:15:48,260
something else well the way that we've

375
00:15:51,590 --> 00:15:49,950
measured measured it is a one time

376
00:15:54,530 --> 00:15:51,600
measurement after it's grown for five

377
00:15:56,420 --> 00:15:54,540
days so from in that way you would say

378
00:15:58,370 --> 00:15:56,430
you could call it a speed of growth

379
00:16:00,800 --> 00:15:58,380
effect because they're growing more

380
00:16:03,230 --> 00:16:00,810
robustly but whether its speed or just

381
00:16:05,660 --> 00:16:03,240
greater vitality you know that becomes a

382
00:16:07,730 --> 00:16:05,670
that becomes a theoretical question but

383
00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:07,740
if the practical question is if you can

384
00:16:12,140 --> 00:16:09,930
get more Bali to grow in a quicker

385
00:16:14,270 --> 00:16:12,150
period of time for the same amount of

386
00:16:16,450 --> 00:16:14,280
resources that's a valuable thing for

387
00:16:18,290 --> 00:16:16,460
our society and for the world

388
00:16:21,470 --> 00:16:18,300
Gary I I don't know if you're familiar

389
00:16:23,630 --> 00:16:21,480
with the name Bill sweet Bill sweet

390
00:16:26,420 --> 00:16:23,640
wrote a book called a journey into

391
00:16:28,370 --> 00:16:26,430
prayer about two Christian Scientists

392
00:16:31,970 --> 00:16:28,380
that wanted to prove that prayer worked

393
00:16:34,550 --> 00:16:31,980
this is in the 60s and they started

394
00:16:36,170 --> 00:16:34,560
doing research exactly or similar to

395
00:16:38,510 --> 00:16:36,180
what you're talking about they knew

396
00:16:40,490 --> 00:16:38,520
there was a placebo effect they knew

397
00:16:42,380 --> 00:16:40,500
that was with humans and so they wanted

398
00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:42,390
to use something that would not you know

399
00:16:47,930 --> 00:16:45,410
the SIBO effect would not interfere with

400
00:16:48,610 --> 00:16:47,940
they got the same kind of results your

401
00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:48,620
reporting

402
00:16:53,110 --> 00:16:50,090
year over and over again but they were

403
00:16:55,660 --> 00:16:53,120
rejected both by their religious

404
00:16:58,480 --> 00:16:55,670
community and by academia and their

405
00:16:59,980 --> 00:16:58,490
scientific community I imagine Larry

406
00:17:02,980 --> 00:16:59,990
Dossey knows more about this and I hope

407
00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:02,990
he will speak about it but they ended up

408
00:17:08,260 --> 00:17:05,570
after years finally starting to be

409
00:17:10,390 --> 00:17:08,270
accepted ended up committing suicide the

410
00:17:13,150 --> 00:17:10,400
two of them together really yes sir

411
00:17:14,590 --> 00:17:13,160
I suggest you check that book out there

412
00:17:16,360 --> 00:17:14,600
I'm probably glad that I didn't know

413
00:17:18,850 --> 00:17:16,370
about this before I started the research

414
00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:18,860
because I have no interest in following

415
00:17:25,270 --> 00:17:22,250
in their footsteps you know it's a

416
00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:25,280
challenge if you do any of this with any

417
00:17:30,610 --> 00:17:28,730
particular religious persuasion if I did

418
00:17:33,130 --> 00:17:30,620
this as a fundamentalist Christian or a

419
00:17:35,800 --> 00:17:33,140
Christian Scientist or a Muslim or a

420
00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:35,810
Jewish person or whatever I went

421
00:17:40,120 --> 00:17:37,610
immediately beginning in I think even

422
00:17:45,280 --> 00:17:40,130
more trouble than just doing this in a

423
00:17:47,590 --> 00:17:45,290
quote secular fashion we have a C

424
00:17:50,230 --> 00:17:47,600
testing laboratory and we've done some

425
00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:50,240
of this kind of work here in the Denver

426
00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:51,410
area hmm

427
00:17:55,060 --> 00:17:53,690
and one and I we can talk about but one

428
00:17:58,720 --> 00:17:55,070
of the questions I want to ask you is

429
00:18:00,760 --> 00:17:58,730
did you notice any increased actual

430
00:18:04,120 --> 00:18:00,770
germination percentage did more seeds

431
00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:04,130
actually germinate in the in the trials

432
00:18:10,210 --> 00:18:07,250
where there was intention the answer is

433
00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:10,220
it looked that way but since most of our

434
00:18:15,700 --> 00:18:12,650
seeds germinated with this procedure

435
00:18:20,350 --> 00:18:15,710
there isn't much room for variability in

436
00:18:22,270 --> 00:18:20,360
that sense okay so if this is not the

437
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:22,280
preparation in which you'd want to look

438
00:18:27,070 --> 00:18:24,770
at rate of germination because almost

439
00:18:29,950 --> 00:18:27,080
all the seeds Germany you know good 85